
This Tom Binns silver-plated Swarovski crystal safety pin necklace looks kind of familiar…Except mine’s more interesting, ha.
Pictures from net-a-porter.com
New hair style forward in 2012

This Tom Binns silver-plated Swarovski crystal safety pin necklace looks kind of familiar…
I'd been wanting to see it for ages and finally watched it tonight. At first I thought (and tweeted): the perfect romantic comedy. It didn’t follow the lame mainstream chick flick structure; it was exactly what I’d hoped it would be.
Summer, the main character’s romantic interest, was really just another Manic Pixie Dream Girl (the term was coined by film critic Nathan Rabin who described it as "that bubbly, shallow cinematic creature that exists solely in the fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and adventures"). You know, the fun quirky girl who seems like such a breath of fresh air in this dull world that we live in, but is actually just like the next girl in the next film (examples include Kirsten Dunst’s character in Elizabethtown, Kate Hudson’s character in Almost Famous, Audrey Hepburn’s character in Breakfast at Tiffany’s, and arguably also Cassie from Skins and Amélie). Someone with no backstory or future plans, the MPDG is nothing more than an exciting indie fantasy. But don’t get me wrong, I'll choose the Manic Pixie Dream Girl over the flawless but clumsy girl who is the main character in any other rom com any day.
So yeah, it kind of was the perfect romantic comedy, but in a textbook way, you know? It had all the right ingredients, and the execution was done immaculately, but they hadn’t added anything completely new to the recipe. And to me, that just seems too easy…
I don't mind that she decided to wear a dress that had LED lights in it. Fine, I lie, I actually applaud it. But it's everything else about the dress that I don't like. It just looks like a bunch of melted marshmallows stuck together. And such an amount of them is enough to make anyone sick. Even multicoloured lights can't save that.
Going back to the lights, they're a fantastically eccentric choice. Which reminds me of this time a couple of years ago when I was walking down the street with some friends from school and we were commenting on the clothes that were displayed on a shop window. The word 'eccentric' came up which led to an argument over the word's meaning, or rather, the connotation. They were convinced that it was a negative term (you know, a politer way to say 'weird' or 'insane') while I completely disagreed.
I think the best way to end this post is to write down this quotation that a read yesterday and found utterly brilliant: "Remember that always dressing in understated good taste is the same as playing dead." (Susan Catherine)
I like Alexa. And I like Phillip Lim (who designed her outfit). And I like the idea of going in the masculine direction when everyone else is wearing predictably similar dresses. And I like it when ribbon is worn as a tie.
The dress is interesting and quite lovely, but I wish she’d have left the gloves home. And the blue eye makeup is just all kinds of wrong with this look.
Pictures from justjared.buzznet.com

Chloë Sevigny looks a bit underdressed, but the dress is cute and quirky and I’d actually love to own it. To wear on a much less formal occasion, though.
and Solange Knowles'
(from the neck up mainly).
Here are some nice looks from random festival goers:


I for one am disappointed. It’s almost as bad as Emma Watson’s line for People Tree. 

By bad I mean boring, because what's worse than boring? And while you could expect something like that from a goody two-shoes like Emma, I believed that Aggy was capable of more. I mean, look at her quirky style: 





I don’t see the point in creating a line of clothing that looks completely safe and average. Example: 
This is not a design as such, is it? It’s just a shirt. It’s not her. It’s not anyone really. If you’re gonna do something, do it your way. Do something new, something different. That’s my philosophy anyway. That’s why I never get the same haircut or colour twice and why I barely have any regular shoes, jeans and shirts. What’s the point in spending my money on boring clothes when I could get several sparkly bracelets or massive earrings for the same amount? Not the most practical approach to money, or indeed life, but so far I’ve got by just fine.
Pictures from tokyofashion.com, vogue.co.uk x3, popchampagne.blogspot.com x3, agynessdeyn-online.blogspot.com x7, vogue.co.uk
This Lanvin dress is gorgeous and I love the diamond roses by Stephen Russell. The only thing that annoys me is that her Neil Lane hair clip doesn’t really match the rose brooches on her dress. But I know me and my neuroses are most likely at fault here.
I first saw her Atelier Versace dress from the side and thought, this silver hedgehog on her shoulder is a strange choice, but I don’t hate it. It’s actually pretty interesting.
This dress is too shiny and interesting for me to be able to say a bad word about it. I’m not too sure about the shoes though. They’re a bit “Help! Somebody please untie me before the pirates return!” I think she should have chosen more futuristic chains to go with this dress.



Stunning, right?